A ten-school application map that separates the number an institute publishes from the percentile an otherwise ordinary profile should realistically target for a shortlist.
Move the slider to your CAT percentile. “Target met” means your score reaches this guide's planning band, not that a call is guaranteed.
Open every school. Each card names the programme, the published or reported floor status, a realistic planning target, the profile caveat and the source year.
Below 95 did not waste your CAT. It changed the mix of ambitious, realistic and safer applications that makes sense. The costly mistake is using one published floor as proof that a call will arrive.
The reframe: the question is not “Which famous school can I name?” It is “Where does my score, section balance and profile make the application fee rational?”
These are composite, anonymised patterns used to show the decision logic. They are not individual testimonials or guaranteed outcomes.
A candidate treats every reported 85 or 90 cutoff as equally attainable and spends the entire application budget on schools whose composite shortlists are much tougher.
A candidate sees SPJIMR's 85 floor but has no specialisation-aligned evidence, sustained achievements or distinctive academic story.
A strong overall percentile hides one weak section. The candidate assumes every 94 to 96 target is safe and discovers the sectional rule too late.
Institute documents are used for official rules. Where an institute does not publish one clean percentile, independent estimates are labelled as planning targets rather than official cutoffs.
No. It can put TAPMI within a sensible application set for some profiles and make other schools defensible reaches. The right list depends on programme, sectionals, academics, work experience and category.
No. An official floor is a minimum gate. A realistic target estimates the score at which a General category applicant with an ordinary profile can make a defensible application. Composite shortlisting can push practical competition well above the floor.
No. Several institutes use academics, sectionals, work experience, diversity and programme fit alongside CAT. These are application planning bands, not promised calls or offers.
The order compares realistic CAT shortlist targets only. It does not compare programme quality, placements, fees or return on investment. SPJIMR can also shortlist exceptional profiles from its published floor.
CAT 2025 for the 2026 to 2028 intake, using information available in September 2026. Recheck each institute's current notice before applying.
For a real profile check against these floors, CAT coaching, or GD-WAT-PI prep. Have a quick question instead? Use WhatsApp below.