Keep what works
Record the reasoning and checks behind a correct answer, so you can repeat them under time pressure.
By Anshul Wadhwa, Career Counsellor, CCGP Level 1 · Last updated 30 October 2026
Inside the pack
Give every attempt a next step
Fix the cause
Distinguish missing knowledge from misreading, execution errors and pacing. Choose a repair you can retest.
- Cycle-labelled format notes
- Section-wise strategy framework
- Time-allocation template
- Error log with repair prompts
- Personal topic tally
- Time-per-question tracker
- 4-week and 8-week plan skeletons
- Official source links and practice mapping
Read a real preview
Start with the cause of the error
After a timed attempt, separate an unanswered question from a wrong answer. A blank may mean you never reached the question, recognised a weak area, or deliberately stopped before spending more time. A wrong answer may come from a missing concept, a misread condition, an unsupported inference or a calculation slip; each cause needs a different repair.
Use a question reference in your log rather than copying the question. Record your topic label, time spent, outcome and the reason for the error. Then write a repair you can actually check: explain the rule without notes, identify the evidence that supports an inference, or redo the calculation with units visible.
Choose the repair that would improve your next attempt most. Retest with fresh, authorised material and compare the same skill. A faster attempt is useful only if your reasoning remains sound; a higher total can still hide a repeated weakness.
The pack gives you blank trackers and an adaptable plan for doing this consistently. The topic tally describes your own practice sample. It does not predict the next paper or tell you how likely you are to gain admission.
Read before you start
A worksheet, not a readiness verdict
Separate Indore and Rohtak attempts before comparing your performance. The verified format notes use the published 2026 policies; confirm the rules for your own sitting.
This result is indicative. It is based only on the answers you gave. It is not professional advice, an admission or job prediction, or a guarantee of any outcome. Treat it as one input. Before you decide, check eligibility, fees and requirements with the institution, and talk to your parents or guardian and a qualified counsellor. The decision, and its outcome, remain yours. AptiGuide is not liable for decisions made on this result alone.
Your copy
Open the complete pack
Complete the form to reveal the PDF and readable worksheets. No OTP is required.
Indicative only: based on your answers, not a final decision, prediction or guarantee. Please do not decide on this alone.
Indicative only: based on your answers, not a final decision, prediction or guarantee. Please do not decide on this alone.
Thank you
Your IPMAT analysis pack is ready
Download your copy or open the worksheets below.
Original worksheetsOfficial source linksReviewIdentify the cause
RepairPractise the skill
RetestCheck the change
This is a static PDF link, not secure access control. Anyone with the link can open or share it.
Next 7 days: complete an authorised timed attempt, log the errors and retest your priority repair.
Start with a useful review
Separate Indore and Rohtak attempts before comparing your performance. The verified format notes use the published 2026 policies; confirm the rules for your own sitting.
Your next 7 days
Complete a timed attempt using authorised material, fill the error log and retest your priority repair. Done: a recorded result and a specific change for the next attempt.
What this pack contains
Original strategy notes, time templates, review worksheets and adaptable study plans. It contains no official paper, recalled question or answer key.
Use official source pages
Open the institute or Consortium pages listed at the end. Look for published notices and authorised practice resources. A complete public past-paper archive was not verified.
Keep your own record
Use question references, your timings and your own error descriptions. Keep the paper where you lawfully obtained it.
Verified format reference
Confirmed from official sources opened for this pack. Historical policy details are labelled by cycle; no year-wise difficulty or topic trend is claimed.
Indore reference cycle
The cited IIM Indore policy is for 2026.
Confirmed: official sourceIndore sections
Quantitative Ability (MCQ), Quantitative Ability (Short Answer) and Verbal Ability (MCQ).
Confirmed: official sourceIndore section time
Each section has 40 minutes.
Confirmed: official sourceIndore marking
A correct answer carries 4 marks. A wrong MCQ loses 1 mark; Short Answer has no negative marking.
Confirmed: official sourceIndore section order
Candidates answer sections in a pre-specified order.
Confirmed: official sourceRohtak reference cycle
The cited IIM Rohtak admissions page describes IPM AT 2026.
Confirmed: official sourceRohtak sections and counts
Quantitative Ability, Logical Reasoning and Verbal Ability have 40 questions each.
Confirmed: official sourceRohtak duration
The IPM aptitude test lasts 120 minutes.
Confirmed: official sourceRohtak marking and format
All questions are multiple choice. Each carries 4 marks, with 1 mark deducted for a wrong answer.
Confirmed: official sourceSection-wise repair framework
Original AptiGuide method. These are possible error categories, not statistics about candidates.
Indore: Quantitative Ability (MCQ)
Write the setup before checking options. Log method gaps separately from arithmetic slips. A plausible option is not evidence that the setup is right.
Indore: Quantitative Ability (Short Answer)
Practise completing the calculation and checking the requested form. Record transcription errors separately. Do not let the absence of a penalty consume the section clock.
Indore: Verbal Ability (MCQ)
Explain why the selected answer fits the wording. If a task needs passage evidence, record the reference rather than copying the passage.
Rohtak: Quantitative and Verbal Ability
Maintain separate logs for numerical setup and verbal interpretation. Carry a repaired skill into timed practice before deciding it is secure.
Rohtak: Logical Reasoning
Track missed constraints and invalid deductions. After a wrong answer, rebuild the chain and identify where your conclusion stopped following from the information.
After section practice
Name the error cause, choose a repair and decide what evidence would show the repair worked. Keep your question references beside your own notes.
My priority section
The next repair I will test
Build a time-allocation template
Original worksheet. Published limits are reference facts; your allocation is a practice experiment.
Indore: respect section limits
The cited policy gives 40 minutes per section and a fixed section order. Make a separate attempt, review and checking plan inside each section; do not transfer unused time between them.
Rohtak: test your allocation
The cited IPM format gives 120 minutes for the test. Write a tentative section allocation, record what happened and revise it from your own attempts. This is not an official section timing rule.
Route / cycle
Section
Published time rule
Planned attempt time
Planned review time
Actual time
Questions left and why
Change for the next attempt
Error log: choose a repair
Original worksheet. Keep only question references; do not copy paper text.
Concept gap
You could not explain the method even without a timer. Repair: rebuild the concept, then solve fresh practice.
Reading or inference
You missed a condition or added an unsupported claim. Repair: identify the exact wording that changes the answer.
Execution slip
Your method was sound but a sign, unit or calculation failed. Repair: write the checking step before retrying.
Selection or pacing
You stayed too long or rushed a reachable task. Repair: define a stop cue and test it in the next attempt.
Paper / authorised source
Cycle and route
Question reference
Section / topic
Outcome: correct, wrong or blank
Cause and evidence
Repair task
Retest date and result
Topic tally: describe your sample
Original worksheet. Make topic labels after reviewing your own attempt. Keep mixed-topic items in a separate category to avoid counting them twice.
What the count means
A high count describes this paper only. Record the paper source and cycle beside every tally.
What to practise
Compare repeated errors with the skills you need to repair. A large tally alone does not make a topic your weakest area.
Paper reference
Section
Your topic label
Questions seen
Correct
Wrong
Blank
Repair priority and reason
Time-per-question tracker
Original worksheet. Use a clock or your practice platform log. If you estimate time afterwards, mark it as estimated.
Record the attempt
Log reading time once per passage or set, then each question separately. This prevents shared reading time being counted repeatedly.
Read the pattern
Compare correct and wrong attempts within a similar task type. Do not force every question to take the same time.
Paper and section
Passage / set reference
Shared reading time
Question reference
Question-only time
Actual or estimated?
Outcome
Stop cue for the next attempt
Your 4-week plan
Original planning skeleton. Adapt the workload to school commitments. These weeks are not an official preparation requirement.
Week 1: establish a baseline
Attempt authorised material under the relevant published rules. Complete the error log and choose the repair that matters most.
Week 2: repair the cause
Practise the selected skill slowly enough to explain the method. Retest with fresh material and record what changed.
Week 3: add time pressure
Use section practice with a planned stop cue. Review blank questions as carefully as wrong answers.
Week 4: rehearse and review
Run a fresh timed attempt. Compare repeated error causes, revise your time plan and retain the checks that helped.
Review note
Keep the plan flexible. If the same error returns, change the repair task before adding more tests. Compare evidence from your own attempts, not an assumed rank or cut-off.
Start date
Available study slots
Priority repair
Evidence of improvement
Your 8-week plan
Original planning skeleton. Stretch the same review cycle; do not fill extra weeks with unreviewed mocks.
Weeks 1-2: diagnose
Build a baseline, label error causes and choose a specific skill to repair. Done: a completed log and a clear priority.
Weeks 3-4: rebuild
Alternate untimed skill work with fresh checks. Done: you can explain the method and apply it without notes.
Weeks 5-6: integrate
Mix repaired skills into timed section work. Done: your stop cues and checking habits survive time pressure.
Weeks 7-8: rehearse
Use fresh authorised material, review it fully and reduce repeated errors. Done: an updated plan based on your own evidence.
Review note
Keep the plan flexible. If the same error returns, change the repair task before adding more tests. Compare evidence from your own attempts, not an assumed rank or cut-off.
Weekly review day
Practice material to use
What improved?
What still needs repair?
Sources, practice and limits
Official sources support the format reference. AptiGuide wrote the planning methods and blank worksheets.
Match practice before using a score
Match available quantitative and verbal practice to the section labels above; use logical reasoning practice for Rohtak. For Indore, check whether practice supports Short Answer entry and the published section limits.
Check what is available
Use the existing AptiGuide catalogue to check current free-mock and test-series listings. No specific free mock, section coverage or availability is promised here.
What this cannot tell you
This is a worksheet pack, not a scored readiness test, admission prediction or validated assessment.
Independent guidance
AptiGuide is not affiliated with or endorsed by the exam conducting body.
Before you download
Questions about the pack
Does this include past-paper questions?
No. It contains original analysis frameworks and blank worksheets, with links to official source pages. No questions, passages, options or recalled questions are included.
Is this an official exam pack?
No. This is an independent AptiGuide resource. Use the linked official sources to check the rules for your exam cycle.
Which exam cycle does it cover?
The format notes use IIM Indore and IIM Rohtak material for 2026. Future-cycle rules are not confirmed by this pack.
Does it predict topics or difficulty?
No. The tally records the material you analyse yourself. We do not claim topic-frequency trends, difficulty ratings or future cut-offs.
What happens after I complete the form?
Your pack becomes readable here and a PDF link appears. Saving your details is reported separately; if saving fails, you can retry while keeping access to the pack.
Is the PDF securely gated?
No. The form reveals a same-site static PDF link. Anyone with that link can open or share the file; this is not secure access control.
Will I receive the pack by email?
No automatic email is sent by this page. Download the PDF here or read the same content in the on-page accordions.
How should I use the plans?
Adapt the weekly skeleton to your available study time. Review the cause of each error, repair a specific skill and check it again with fresh authorised material.
How we made this
Evidence first, your practice next
We checked official format sources and wrote the worksheets ourselves. Proposed time allocations and weekly plans are original suggestions, not official rules.
This pack cannot predict admission or future topic frequencies. It does not score your readiness.
This result is indicative. It is based only on the answers you gave. It is not professional advice, an admission or job prediction, or a guarantee of any outcome. Treat it as one input. Before you decide, check eligibility, fees and requirements with the institution, and talk to your parents or guardian and a qualified counsellor. The decision, and its outcome, remain yours. AptiGuide is not liable for decisions made on this result alone.
Official sources
Opened for this pack on 30 October 2026. Check the relevant cycle before using a rule.